18 MEA hair care · cocamidopropyl betaine · hair breakage prevention · hair cuticle protection · hair growth · hair science · scalp health tips · shampoo bar formulation · shampoo for sensitive scalp · sodium cocoyl isethionate (SCI) · sodium cocoyl isethionate shampoo bar · strong hair · sulfate free conditioner bars · superfatting shampoo bars · zero waste hair care
February 24, 2026 · Eddie Polanco, PhD
The Dual Challenge: Formulating Shampoo Bars for Hair and Scalp
If formulating a body cleanser is a balancing act between cleansing and barrier preservation, formulating a shampoo is a high-wire performance with no safety net. You are not cleansing one surface—you are cleansing two fundamentally different substrates at the same time. The scalp is living skin, complete with sebaceous glands, sweat glands, a microbiome, and a delicate acid mantle that must be protected. The hair shaft is dead keratin, incapable of self-repair, coated in a microscopic lipid layer that, once stripped away, is gone forever.
And here is the problem: the scalp produces more sebum than almost any other part of the body. That sebum must be removed aggressively to prevent fungal overgrowth and dandruff. But the hair shaft needs that sebum to remain smooth, shiny, and manageable. Remove too little sebum, and the scalp becomes a breeding ground for Malassezia yeast. Remove too much, and the hair becomes dry, tangled, and brittle.
This is the formulator's dual challenge: cleanse the scalp thoroughly enough to control sebum and prevent dandruff, but gently enough to preserve the acid mantle and the hair's lipid coating. And do it all at a pH that keeps the cuticle flat and smooth, in a solid bar format that rinses cleanly in hard water, with a lather that feels luxurious, and a cost structure that is sustainable.
This is why shampoo formulation is widely regarded as one of the hardest problems in cosmetic chemistry. And this is why most commercial shampoos fail at it.
The Scalp: A Living Ecosystem
The scalp is skin—thicker and more sebaceous than facial skin, but still subject to the same principles of barrier integrity, pH balance, and microbial ecology that we explored in Part 2 of this series.
The scalp's stratum corneum has the same brick-and-mortar structure of corneocytes and lipid matrix. The scalp's acid mantle requires the same pH of 4.5 - 5.5 to function properly. The scalp's microbiome depends on that acidity to maintain a healthy balance of commensal bacteria and suppress pathogenic overgrowth. From a formulation perspective, the scalp deserves the same respect and mildness as the rest of the body.
But the scalp also has one critical difference: sebum production.
Higher Sebum Production Than Body
The scalp contains one of the highest concentrations of sebaceous glands in the human body—second only to the face. These glands secrete sebum, a complex mixture of triglycerides, squalene, wax esters, and free fatty acids, at a rate far exceeding that of the arms, legs, or torso (Scalp Microbiome and Dandruff, MDPI, 2024).
In moderate amounts, sebum is beneficial. It travels down the hair shaft, lubricating the cuticle and imparting shine and manageability. But when sebum accumulates on the scalp—especially in warm, humid conditions, or in individuals who wash infrequently—it becomes a liability.
The Malassezia-Sebum-Dandruff Connection
The primary culprit in sebum-related scalp dysfunction is Malassezia, a genus of lipophilic (fat-loving) yeast that is a normal part of the scalp microbiome. Malassezia globosa and Malassezia restricta are present on nearly all human scalps, feeding on the triglycerides in sebum.
The problem begins when Malassezia secretes lipase enzymes to break down sebum triglycerides into free fatty acids. One of the byproducts of this metabolism is oleic acid, a C18:1 monounsaturated fatty acid that, for many people, is a potent irritant (Malassezia globosa and restricta, ScienceDirect, 2007).
When oleic acid penetrates the stratum corneum of the scalp, it triggers an inflammatory cascade: cytokine release, keratinocyte proliferation, and accelerated desquamation (the shedding of dead skin cells). The result is dandruff—visible flakes of prematurely shed corneocytes, accompanied by itching, redness, and irritation (Scalp Microbiome and Dandruff, MDPI, 2024).
The more sebum on the scalp, the more food for Malassezia. The more Malassezia, the more oleic acid. The more oleic acid, the more inflammation and flaking. It is a vicious cycle, and the only way to break it is to remove excess sebum from the scalp regularly.
This is why aggressive cleansing is necessary for scalp health—but it must be balanced against the needs of the hair shaft and the scalp barrier.
The Hair Shaft: Dead But Delicate
Once a hair fiber emerges from the follicle, it is no longer alive. It has no blood supply, no nerve endings, no capacity for self-repair. The hair you see and touch is a dead structure composed primarily of keratin, a fibrous structural protein, arranged in overlapping layers:
- The cuticle: the outermost protective layer, composed of 6-10 layers of overlapping, scale-like cells
- The cortex: the bulk of the hair shaft, composed of long keratin filaments
- The medulla: a central core (present in thick hair, absent in fine hair)
Of these, the cuticle is the layer that determines how the hair looks, feels, and behaves.
Cuticle Architecture: Friction, Light, and Tangling
The cuticle is not smooth. Under a microscope, it resembles overlapping roof shingles, with each scale oriented from the root toward the tip of the hair. When the cuticle scales lie flat against the hair shaft, the hair feels smooth, reflects light cleanly (giving it shine), and glides past neighboring hairs with minimal friction. This is what we perceive as "healthy" hair.
When the cuticle scales lift away from the shaft—due to alkaline pH, mechanical damage, or harsh surfactants—the hair becomes rough. The lifted scales catch on each other like Velcro, increasing friction and causing tangling. Light no longer reflects uniformly off the surface, so the hair appears dull and matte. Water penetrates the cortex more easily, breaking hydrogen bonds in the keratin structure and making the hair more fragile and prone to breakage (The Shampoo pH can Affect the Hair, PMC, 2014).
This cuticle lifting is pH-dependent. Research has consistently shown that alkaline pH (above 7) causes the cuticle to swell and lift, while acidic pH (4.5 - 5.5) causes the cuticle to flatten and smooth (The Shampoo pH can Affect the Hair, PMC, 2014). This is not a minor cosmetic effect—it is a structural change that directly impacts hair strength, elasticity, and appearance.
The 18-MEA Layer: The F-Layer You Can Never Get Back
Virgin, undamaged hair is coated in a thin, continuous layer of 18-methyleicosanoic acid (18-MEA), a branched-chain fatty acid covalently bonded to the proteins on the outermost surface of the cuticle. This layer, approximately 1.1 nanometers thick, is often referred to as the F-layer (fatty acid layer), and it is what gives healthy hair its natural hydrophobicity—its ability to repel water and resist frizz (Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle, MDPI, 2017).
The 18-MEA layer serves several critical functions: - Reduces friction between hair fibers, preventing tangling - Repels water, reducing hygral fatigue (damage from repeated wetting and drying) - Provides shine by creating a smooth, reflective surface - Protects the cuticle from environmental damage and oxidation
But here is the devastating truth: 18-MEA is permanently removed by harsh surfactants, bleaching, and chemical treatments (Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle, MDPI, 2017). Once it is gone, it does not regenerate. The hair cannot produce new 18-MEA because the hair is dead. The only way to restore hydrophobicity is to deposit a synthetic lipid layer—through conditioning treatments or superfatting in the shampoo itself.
This is why virgin hair behaves so differently from chemically treated or frequently washed hair. Virgin hair still has its 18-MEA layer intact. Damaged hair does not. And every wash with a harsh surfactant strips away a little more of what remains.
Protein Deamidation and Structural Weakening
Beyond the cuticle, prolonged exposure to alkaline pH or harsh surfactants can cause protein deamidation—a chemical modification in which the amide side chains of glutamine and asparagine residues in keratin are hydrolyzed to carboxylic acids (Insights into structural and proteomic alterations related to pH-induced changes, PubMed, 2024). This alteration increases the negative charge density on the hair fiber, which in turn increases electrostatic repulsion between fibers (more frizz and flyaways) and weakens the hydrogen bonds that hold the keratin structure together (more breakage).
Studies have shown that at pH levels above 10, alkaline hydrolysis of peptide and disulfide bonds begins to occur, permanently weakening the hair structure (Effect of equilibrium pH on the structure and properties of bleach-damaged human hair fibers, Wiley, 2020). Even at pH 8-9, repeated exposure causes cumulative damage.
This is why traditional soap, with its pH of 9-11, is catastrophic for hair. Not only does it lift the cuticle and strip the 18-MEA layer, but it also chemically degrades the keratin structure itself. One wash with soap might not break your hair, but repeated use will, inevitably, lead to fragility, split ends, and breakage.
pH: The Non-Negotiable
If there is one single parameter that determines whether a shampoo formulation will succeed or fail, it is pH.
Hair is naturally acidic. The isoelectric point of human hair—the pH at which the hair carries no net electrical charge—is approximately 3.67 (On Hair Care Physicochemistry, PMC, 2023). At pH values above 3.67, the hair carries a net negative charge due to the ionization of carboxyl groups on glutamic acid and aspartic acid residues in the keratin.
The optimal pH range for shampoo formulations is 4.5 - 5.5—acidic enough to flatten the cuticle and minimize negative charge, but not so acidic as to cause excessive protonation and brittleness (The Shampoo pH can Affect the Hair, PMC, 2014).
Cuticle Swelling at Alkaline pH
When hair is exposed to alkaline environments (pH above 7), several damaging processes occur simultaneously: 1. Water penetration increases, causing the cortex to swell and hydrogen bonds in the keratin to break 2. Cuticle scales lift away from the shaft, increasing surface roughness and friction 3. Negative charge density increases, amplifying electrostatic repulsion and frizz 4. Disulfide bonds become susceptible to cleavage, weakening the hair's structural integrity
The higher the pH, the more severe these effects. At pH 10-11 (the pH of traditional soap), the damage is immediate and visible. But even at pH 7-8, repeated exposure causes cumulative harm.
How to Formulate and Test pH in Solid Bars
Because pH is a property of aqueous solutions, an anhydrous (water-free) solid bar does not have a measurable pH until it is dissolved in water. To determine the effective pH of a solid shampoo bar:
- Weigh out 1-2 grams of the bar.
- Dissolve it in 50 mL of distilled or deionized water.
- Stir until fully dissolved.
- Measure the pH using a calibrated pH meter.
The pH of this solution is a good approximation of the in-use pH—the pH that the hair will experience when the bar is applied to wet hair.
To adjust the pH, formulators typically add small amounts of citric acid or lactic acid during the manufacturing process. These acids not only lower the pH but also help to smooth the cuticle by providing additional acidic buffering during rinsing.
Surfactant Selection for Shampoo Bars
Shampoo bars must cleanse more aggressively than body bars to handle the sebum load of the scalp, but they must do so without lifting the cuticle or stripping the 18-MEA layer from the hair. This requires careful surfactant selection and synergistic blending.
Why Shampoo Needs Stronger Cleansing Than Body Soap
The sebum production rate on the scalp is significantly higher than on the body, and sebum is more concentrated around the hair follicles. A body bar formulated at 15-20% total surfactant content may feel gentle and effective on the skin, but it will likely leave the scalp feeling greasy and heavy because it cannot remove enough sebum.
Shampoo bars typically require 20-30% total surfactant content to achieve adequate cleansing of the scalp. However, this higher surfactant load must be balanced with co-surfactants and pH control to avoid damaging the hair.
SCI as Primary Cleanser
Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate (SCI) remains the best choice for shampoo bars, for all the same reasons it excels in body bars: large molecular size (33.5 Å micelles), inability to penetrate the scalp's stratum corneum, excellent lather, and pH adjustability (Ananthapadmanabhan et al., 2004).
For shampoo bars, SCI should be capped at 45% of the total formulation to ensure gentle cleansing. While higher concentrations are sometimes used industrially, our data shows that staying at or below 45% SCI, when supported by a strong co-surfactant framework, provides perfect sebum removal without risking cuticle damage.
CAPB as Co-Surfactant: Cuticle Protection and Detangling
Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB) plays an even more critical role in shampoo bars than in body bars. When combined with SCI, CAPB forms mixed micelles that are less likely to denature proteins and disrupt the cuticle structure (Wolf et al., 2001). But CAPB also provides a secondary benefit specific to hair: improved slip and detangling.
Wet hair is particularly vulnerable to mechanical damage. When hair is saturated with water, the cortex swells, the cuticle lifts slightly, and the fibers become prone to tangling and breakage. A shampoo that provides good slip—meaning the hair glides smoothly through the fingers without catching or pulling—reduces the mechanical stress during washing and rinsing.
CAPB contributes to this slip by reducing the friction coefficient between fibers. For shampoo bars, the optimal ratio of SCI to CAPB is approximately 3:1 to 2:1 (by weight of active surfactant), depending on the hair type the formulation targets. Fine hair benefits from lower CAPB concentrations (3:1), while thick or curly hair, which tangles more easily, benefits from higher CAPB concentrations (2:1).
SLSa as an Alternative (Hard Water Regions)
For customers in regions with hard water—where high concentrations of calcium and magnesium ions interfere with lather and rinsing—Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate (SLSa) is an excellent alternative or complementary surfactant. As discussed in Part 1, SLSa is exceptionally tolerant of hard water and produces stable, abundant lather even in the presence of mineral ions (CIR Expert Panel, 2019).
SLSa can replace SCI entirely, or it can be used in a blend (e.g., 50% SCI + 15% SLSa + 15% CAPB) to improve hard water performance without sacrificing the mildness of SCI.
The primary limitation of SLSa is cost—it is significantly more expensive than SCI. For budget-conscious formulations, SCI + CAPB remains the workhorse combination. For premium or hard-water-specific formulations, SLSa is worth the investment.
What to Avoid (Soap, SLS, High pH)
For shampoo bars, formulators must avoid: - Traditional soap: Alkaline pH (9-11), lifts cuticle, strips 18-MEA, causes tangling and dullness - SLS (Sodium Lauryl Sulfate): Too small, penetrates scalp and hair, strips 18-MEA, causes protein denaturation - High pH formulations (>6.5): Any shampoo with pH above 6.5 will cause cuticle lifting and cumulative damage - Excessive surfactant concentration (>35%): Even mild surfactants can be irritating and drying at very high concentrations; synergistic blends allow for lower total surfactant content
Superfatting for Hair: Targeted Lipid Deposition
If the goal of a shampoo is to remove sebum from the scalp, why would a formulator add oils back into the formulation? The answer lies in understanding the difference between scalp sebum and hair conditioning oils.
Why Hair Needs Superfatting More Than Body Skin
The scalp produces sebum to lubricate the hair, but not all hair gets equal sebum coverage. In individuals with long hair, sebum may coat the first few inches near the scalp but never reaches the ends. In individuals who wash frequently, sebum is removed before it can travel down the shaft at all. And in individuals with damaged or chemically treated hair, the absence of the 18-MEA layer means the hair cannot retain whatever lipids it does encounter—they simply wash away.
This is where superfatting becomes essential. By incorporating small amounts of conditioning oils into the shampoo bar itself, the formulator ensures that even as sebum is removed from the scalp, a replacement lipid layer is deposited onto the hair shaft during rinsing. This lipid layer mimics the function of the 18-MEA layer, reducing friction, improving shine, and protecting the hair from environmental damage.
Best Oils for Hair Superfatting
Not all oils are suitable for shampoo bar superfatting. The ideal conditioning oil should: - Be lightweight and non-greasy - Absorb into the cuticle quickly - Not weigh down fine or thin hair - Provide measurable improvements in shine, smoothness, and manageability
The top choices for hair superfatting are:
Jojoba Oil is a liquid wax ester (not a triglyceride) with a structure remarkably similar to human sebum. It absorbs quickly into the hair cuticle, providing lubrication and shine without feeling heavy or greasy (On Hair Care Physicochemistry, PMC, 2023). Jojoba is particularly well-suited for fine to medium hair.
Babassu Oil is a triglyceride derived from the babassu palm, with a fatty acid profile similar to coconut oil but with a lighter, less occlusive feel. It melts at body temperature, absorbs quickly, and provides conditioning without buildup. Babassu is ideal for individuals in humid climates or those with oily scalps who want conditioning on the hair but not on the scalp.
Argan Oil is rich in oleic acid (C18:1) and vitamin E, making it an excellent choice for smoothing the cuticle and reducing frizz. It is slightly heavier than jojoba or babassu, making it better suited for thick, curly, or coarse hair types that can handle more intensive conditioning.
Superfat Percentage: 5-7% for Fine Hair, 10-15% for Thick/Curly Hair
The appropriate superfat percentage depends on the hair type the formulation targets:
- Fine, thin, or oily hair: 5-7% superfatting (too much will weigh the hair down and make it look greasy)
- Medium or normal hair: 7-10% superfatting
- Thick, curly, or coarse hair: 10-15% superfatting (these hair types require more intensive conditioning to remain manageable)
Superfatting oils should be added during the final stage of bar manufacturing, after the surfactants have been combined and the pH has been adjusted. The oils are mixed into the surfactant base and then molded into bars. During use, as the surfactants lift away sebum and dirt, the superfatting oils are released and deposit onto the hair shaft.
Formulating the Complete Shampoo Bar
A well-formulated solid shampoo bar is a precisely balanced system of surfactants, co-surfactants, fatty alcohols for structure, pH adjusters, and conditioning oils.
Surfactant Blend Ratios
A typical shampoo bar formulation might include: - 35-45% SCI (primary cleanser, strictly capped) - 20-30% CAPB (co-surfactant for mildness and slip) - 0-10% SLSa (optional, for hard water performance) - 10-15% fatty alcohols or acids (cetyl alcohol, stearic acid) for structural integrity - 5-15% superfatting oils (jojoba, babassu, argan, depending on target hair type)
pH Adjustment Strategy
After combining all ingredients, the formulator must test the pH by dissolving a small amount of the bar in distilled water. If the pH is above 5.5, citric acid or lactic acid should be added incrementally until the target pH of 4.5 - 5.5 is achieved.
It is critical to test the pH in water that approximates the hardness of the target market's water supply. Hard water is slightly alkaline and will raise the effective pH of the shampoo during use. Formulators should aim for the lower end of the range (4.5) if they expect their customers to have hard water.
Hard Water Testing
Every shampoo bar should be tested in hard water before it goes to market. To simulate hard water in the lab, dissolve calcium chloride (CaCl₂) and magnesium chloride (MgCl₂) in distilled water to achieve a hardness level of 200-300 ppm (parts per million), which is typical for many regions.
Test the bar by lathering it in the hard water solution and rinsing. A well-formulated bar should produce adequate lather and rinse cleanly without leaving a waxy residue or film on the hair. If the bar performs poorly in hard water, consider increasing the proportion of SLSa or adding a chelating agent like citric acid or sodium citrate to bind the calcium and magnesium ions.
Clarifying vs Daily-Use Formulations
Some formulators choose to create two distinct shampoo bar types:
Daily-use bars are formulated for regular cleansing with higher superfat content (7-12%) and slightly lower surfactant concentration (20-25%). These bars are gentle enough for daily or every-other-day use and provide conditioning during each wash.
Clarifying bars are formulated for occasional deep cleansing with minimal or no superfatting (0-5%) and higher surfactant concentration (25-30%). These bars are used weekly or biweekly to remove product buildup, excess oils, and environmental residues that accumulate over time.
Offering both types allows customers to tailor their hair care routine to their specific needs, alternating between daily conditioning washes and periodic clarifying washes.
The Potionologie Approach
At Potionologie, we approach shampoo bar formulation as a dual-target problem: we must care for the living scalp as carefully as we care for the skin on the rest of the body, while simultaneously preserving the dead hair shaft in a way that no other cleanser formulation requires.
We formulate our shampoo bars with SCI as the primary surfactant strictly capped at 45% of the total formulation, providing effective sebum removal from the scalp to prevent dandruff while completely eliminating the risk of over-stripping. We buffer the SCI with CAPB at roughly a 2:1 ratio (approx 20-25%) to form mild, protein-sparing mixed micelles that protect the cuticle and reduce tangling.
We adjust the pH to 4.5 - 5.5 using citric acid, ensuring that the cuticle remains flat and smooth during washing and rinsing. We test every batch in hard water to confirm that it lathers well and rinses cleanly without leaving residue.
We superfat our shampoo bars with 7-10% jojoba oil as our standard formulation, providing lightweight conditioning that does not weigh down fine or medium hair. For customers with thick, curly, or coarse hair, we offer a deep conditioning variant with 12-15% babassu and argan oil blend, providing more intensive lipid deposition for hair types that require it.
We never use traditional soap for shampoo bars. Not because soap is "unnatural" or "toxic," but because its alkaline pH is fundamentally incompatible with hair health. We never use SLS or SLES, because their small molecular size and aggressive lipid-stripping action permanently damage the 18-MEA layer. And we never formulate above pH 5.5, because we know that cuticle lifting and protein deamidation are not cosmetic inconveniences—they are structural damage.
This is not a trend. It is chemistry. And it is the difference between a shampoo bar that cleans your hair and a shampoo bar that preserves it.
Conclusion
Formulating a shampoo bar is the hardest balancing act in cosmetic chemistry. You are cleaning two surfaces—a living scalp that requires sebum removal and acid mantle preservation, and a dead hair shaft that requires cuticle protection and lipid replacement. You must cleanse aggressively enough to prevent dandruff, but gently enough to avoid stripping the 18-MEA layer. You must work at a pH that flattens the cuticle, in a format that is solid and convenient, with a lather that is satisfying, and a cost that is accessible.
Most shampoos fail at this. They cleanse too harshly, lifting the cuticle and stripping the lipid layer, leaving hair tangled, dull, and brittle. Or they cleanse too gently, leaving the scalp greasy and the hair limp. Or they formulate at the wrong pH, causing cumulative damage with every wash.
The solution is not complicated—it just requires understanding the biology of the scalp, the structure of the hair shaft, and the chemistry of surfactants. It requires choosing large-molecule surfactants that cannot penetrate the scalp barrier. It requires forming mixed micelles that reduce protein denaturation. It requires formulating at pH 4.5 - 5.5 to keep the cuticle flat. And it requires superfatting with lightweight oils to replace the lipids that must be removed.
This is the science of shampoo bars. And for those who understand it, the results are unmistakable: clean scalp, smooth hair, preserved barrier, and no compromise.
References
Ananthapadmanabhan, K.P., Moore, D.J., Subramanyan, K., Misra, M., & Meyer, F. (2004). Cleansing without compromise: The impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatologic Therapy, 17(Suppl. 1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04s1002.x
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel. (2019). Safety Assessment of Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate as Used in Cosmetics. Retrieved from https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/RR_Sodium%20Lauryl%20Sulfoacetate.pdf
Gomes, A.C., Mohammadzadeh, S., Fernandes, I., Mendes, T., Ribeiro, A., Cavaco-Paulo, A., & Fernandes, M.M. (2023). On hair care physicochemistry: From structure and degradation to novel biobased conditioning agents. Polymers, 15(3), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030608
Malinauskyte, E., Cornwell, P.A., Gethings, L.A., Richardson, M., Ojogun, V., Hasna, A.M., Sammon, C., Rainey, T., Harland, D.P., Kelly, R., Smith, J., Shrimpton, S., Flanagan, J., & Moore, D.J. (2020). Effect of equilibrium pH on the structure and properties of bleach-damaged human hair fibers. Biopolymers, 111(8), e23401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.23401
MDPI. (2017). Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle. Cosmetics, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020031
MDPI. (2024). Scalp Microbiome and Dandruff—Exploring Novel Biobased Esters. Cosmetics, 11(5), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11050174
Nogueira, A.C.S., Joekes, I., & Silva, C.M. (2014). The shampoo pH can affect the hair: Myth or reality? International Journal of Trichology, 6(3), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7753.139078
PMC. (2014). The Shampoo pH can Affect the Hair: Myth or Reality? International Journal of Trichology, 6(3), 95-99. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4158629/
PMC. (2023). On Hair Care Physicochemistry: From Structure and Degradation to Novel Biobased Conditioning Agents. Polymers, 15(3), 608. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9921463/
PubMed. (2024). Insights into structural and proteomic alterations related to pH-induced changes and protein deamidation in hair. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39529213/
ScienceDirect. (2007). Malassezia globosa and restricta: Breakthrough Understanding of the Etiology and Treatment of Dandruff and Seborrheic Dermatitis through Whole-Genome Analysis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings, 12(2), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jidsymp.5650049
Wolf, R., Wolf, D., Tüzün, B., & Tüzün, Y. (2001). Soaps, shampoos, and detergents. Clinics in Dermatology, 19(4), 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-081x(01)00188-2